Saturday, January 12, 2013

To be PERFECT, what does that mean, exactly?

Tonight I read this post by my friend, Jenny.  She's not an art teacher, and, thus, it's not an art teacher blog, but it got me thinking. Specifically, I was thinking back to an incident that happened sometime in my first several years of teaching.  We had some concerns about a student, and were calling the parents in to discuss the child's [lack of] progress.  I'd brought some of her work samples to the meeting and when I showed the mother, she cried.  Not out of worry or concern--out of love and adoration.  I quickly realized several things: #1, always bring "benchmark" work to parent meetings (artistically gifted/talented student work, average work . . .), #2, you never really know what goes on at home--a child with it all together may not have a great home life, and conversely, a struggling student very well could be the center of a parent's universe (as the all should be), and #3, I [was] a lot more of an uppity b&^$% than I realized. I was young.  I'd gone to a top-rated private art school AND had gone on to get a whole other bachelor's in art education after that and had probably started on my master's.  I thought I knew exactly what I was talking about and the parents would just be bowled over by my knowledge, prestige and confidence. Ummmm, not so much.  I can only speak from my own experience, but I know I learned a heck of a lot teaching those first seven and a half years in a brand-new urban elementary school with changing administration, revolving staff and no playground or discipline plan until well into the second year.  And I learned it on my feet, and quickly, if I didn't want to get ran over.  I had a child to feed, clothe and house, so failure was never an option.
That parent meeting sealed some things I'd followed but had no real reason why prior to that day.  Things like: I hang up everyone's work.  Period.  Not finished? Still hanging it up.  Not that pretty/really sloppy/looks-like-you-were-riding-an-outer-space-pony-while-the-directions-were-being-given? Still hanging it up. Life skills/multi-handicapped student mainstreamed into the class? Definately hanging it up with all the others, and proudly,too.  Watching that mother tear and up and say "ooohhhh, it's so beautiful" over the very artwork I'd looked at scornfully just before made me stop and realize I had no right to think that I knew what was going on with her daughter when she worked on her art.  I also realized perfection isn't the goal, thinking is.  When I first became a teacher (one where I had my own classroom and my own plan) I said "I want them to think" but I didn't really dwell on it.  Thinking was the forefront of what I taught, it drove my instruction for many years.  And then, well, I don't know what happened.  Maybe it was just something that got a little lost in the shuffle, maybe it's all those conferences I go to, blogs I read where everyone's stuff looks so great and I think "Oh, my kids can do that!" without even thinking WHY should they do that? Is it important? Will it help them become better thinkers? Better artists?
There's so much we deal with as teachers (in my district right now, it's learning targets, and I've got to be honest and say--I forget all about them all the time.  Sometimes I post them, I never read them to the students, I don't even think they know where to look for them. . . SIGH, I really suck at this) and it's easy to get caught up in this or that (latest educational trends, juicy workplace gossip, oh-my-goodness-I'm-probably-a-step-or-two-away-from-being-featured-on-Hoarders: Buried Alive-based-on-the-state-of-my-classroom) and just LIFE.  I want to remember my goal: to educate them to think about a variety of solutions to problems, not to strive for "perfection."  'Cause I'm not sure I even know what that is, but if we achieve it, what else is left?  Now to go prepare some PERFECT lessons to foster thinking. . .

7 comments:

  1. Thank you for posting this! This is always an ongoing argument at our region art meetings...do you grade the younger kids? Some say you should because they still need to learn what you're teaching and show improvement...some say you shouldn't because everyone learns at a different rate and why would you want to squash their creativity/excitement about art by giving them a bad grade?

    I have to grade student artwork and I have yet to really have a parent meeting about an issue with a student (I'm a third year teacher), but I have used artwork out of my room to send with a classroom teacher to an IEP meeting for a student. They were trying to convince the parents that this student needs an IEP and additional services because he was way behind his fellow 1st grade peers. His artwork definitely showed that. I sent his artwork with various other examples made by students in his own class. We were drawing pumpkin patches, and had done two smaller projects before we did the final project, and even on his final project, he didn't use the color orange! He could tell me what scribbles were pumpkins and what was going on, but if you looked at his artwork and didn't know the project, you would think a Pre-K student had scribbled it. It is always so important to be able to back yourself up!

    Aside from the requirements of Marzano (which our school has switched to because of APPR), I have come to find that I really like using rubrics with the younger kids because it basically tells the parents what their kids are being evaluated on and why they have received the grade that they did on their project.

    www.artroom104.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mrs. Impey,
      Currently, the district I'm in doesn't grade at the elementary level in art (at all). My previous/first district graded loosely K-2 and grades 3-5. K-2 was something like +, - check, and in 3-5 I used scoring guides, individual ,to every single project. It was helpful for the parents, but a LOT of work for me. I've seen no difference in student work switching districts and going to a non-grading system. I'm a huuuugggeeee Alfie Kohn fan, so the non-grading thing works with me. I keep everything they do until our school art fair, when students choose their two best to display. Which is why I may be featured on Hoarders soon ;-)

      Delete
  2. This is a wonderful post. As a first year teacher I am struggling with following the curriculum that is currently in place at my school. I do not believe that the lessons I am "encouraged" to use stress the importance of creative thinking enough. I am told that I cannot give watercolors or colored pencils to my students in third grade because they developmentally can't handle/use them properly (WHAT THE HECK???) I have been implementing my own lessons and trying to encourage that there multiple ways to solve our Artists Challenges every week...and yes we are using watercolors and colored pencils this year....

    art-explorers.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good for you!!! Here's my question: is there *really* someone watching over what you're doing who knows the curriculum and that watercolors/colored pencils "can't" be used at 3rd grade? It's been my experience that that person doesn't exist (at least not where I've taught!)

      Delete
    2. there is another art teacher at my school that sticks to the curriculum...I think I have helped her realize that there some things that our students can handle if we give them the time to explore and proper instruction

      Delete
  3. "I hang up everyone's work. Period. Not finished? Still hanging it up. Not that pretty/really sloppy/looks-like-you-were-riding-an-outer-space-pony-while-the-directions-were-being-given? Still hanging it up. Life skills/multi-handicapped student mainstreamed into the class? Definately hanging it up with all the others, and proudly,too." ABSOLUTELY. Thanks for the post. :)

    ReplyDelete

Pin It